Predictive ability of fetal biometric measurements and fetal weight estimation for newborn trophic status
Keywords:
fetal growth, fetal weight, fetal growth retardationAbstract
Introduction: fetal ultrasound allows the assessment of anthropometric data that provide information on gestational age and fetal growth.Objective: to valorize the predictive capacity of fetal biometric measurements and the estimation of fetal weight for deviations in the trophic condition of the newborn.
Methods: a descriptive cross-sectional research was conducted in the City of Santa Clara in the period between 2013 and 2016. The study population was 2 529 pregnant women who underwent obstetric ultrasound pregnancy control and the sample was 2 228, selected by non-probabilistic sampling by criteria. Data collection was done through the Genetics Record Book of the health area.
Results: the category of normal was predominant in the variables biparietal diameter, head circumference and abdominal circumference of fetuses born later with trophic condition of adequate for gestational age (between 10 and 90 percentiles) and the values of femoral length move in the normal range regardless of trophic conditions at birth. There is coincidence between the percentile approximations obtained for each variable and the results obtained for the trophic condition at birth.
Conclusions: In general, there is a predominance of coincidence between the percentile approximations obtained for each variable and the results obtained for the trophic condition at birth.
Downloads
References
1.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 134: fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2013 [citado 21/02/2022];121(5):1122-1133. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23635765/. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000429658.85846.f9
2.Arteaga Martínez SM, García Peláez MI. Embriología Humana y Biología del desarrollo. 2da ed. Buenos Aires: Editorial Médica Panamericana; 2017.
3.Zerquera Rodríguez JR, Cabada Martínez Y, Zerquera Rodríguez D, Delgado Acosta HM. Factores de riesgo relacionados con bajo peso al nacer en el municipio Cienfuegos. Medisur [Internet]. 2015 [citado 21/01/2022];13(3):366-374. Disponible en: http://www.medisur.sld.cu/index.php/medisur/article/view/2861/1720
4.Pérez González JA, Martínez Lemus O, Jiménez Abreu SE, Rodríguez Díaz H. Morbilidad, mortalidad y supervivencia en recién nacidos con peso menor a 1500 gr. Rev Cubana Med Int Emerg. [Internet]. 2018 [citado 21/01/2022];17(1):71-80. Disponible en: http://www.revmie.sld.cu/index.php/mie/article/view/281/html_138
5.Malacova E, Regan A, Nassar N, Raynes-Greenow C, Leonard H, Srinivasjois R, et al. Risk of stillbirth, preterm delivery, and fetal growth restriction following exposure in a previous birth: systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG [Internet]. 2018 [citado 21/01/2022];125(2):183-192. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28856792/. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14906
6.Moreno Reyes KF, Ayala Peralta FD, Guevara Ríos E, Carranza Asmat C, Luna Figueroa AM. Prevalencia y factores obstétricos asociados a restricción del crecimiento fetal intrauterino. Rev Peru Investig Matern Perinat [Internet]. 2021 [citado 21/01/2021];10(4):36-43. Disponible en: https://investigacionmaternoperinatal.inmp.gob.pe/index.php/rpinmp/article/view/259/297. https://doi.org/10.33421/inmp.2021259
7.Nicolaides KH, Wrigth D, Syngelaki A, Wrigth A, Akolekar R. Fetal Medicine Foundation fetal and neonatal population weight charts. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2018 [citado 21/01/2021];52(1):44-51. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29696704/. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.19073
8.Britez Centurión BM. Caracterización de las embarazadas con restricción del crecimiento intrauterino en el servicio de Ginecología y Obstetricia del Hospital Central del Instituto de Previsión Social, 2017 [tesis]. Coronel Oviedo –Paraguay: Universidad Nacional de Caaguazú; 2018 [citado 21/01/2021]. Disponible en: https://docs.bvsalud.org/biblioref/2019/06/999854/caracterizacion-de-las-embarazadas-con-restriccion-del-crecimie_ibeveME.pdf
9.López Barbancho D, Terán de Frutos JM, Candelas González N, Díaz de Luna MC, Marrodán Serrano MD, Lomaglio DB, et al. Curvas percentilares de peso al nacimiento por edad gestacional para la población de la provincia de Catamarca (Argentina). Nutr Hosp [Internet]. 2015 [citado 21/01/2022];31(2):682-688. Disponible en https://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/nh/v31n2/19originalobesidad09.pdf
10.Sadler TW. Anomalías congénitas y diagnóstico prenatal. En Sadler TW. Langman. Embriología Médica. 14ed. Países Bajos: Walter Kluwer; 2019.
11.Simeoni U, Bocquet A, Briend A, Chouraqui JP, Darmaun D, Dupont C, et al. Early origins of adult disease. Arch Pediatr [Internet]. 2016 [citado 21/01/2022];23(5):443-446. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26968304/. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcped.2016.01.009
12.Callen P. Mediciones utilizadas para evaluar el peso, el crecimiento y las proporciones corporales del feto. En: Callen P. Ecografía en Obstetricia y Ginecología. 4th ed. Buenos Aires: Editorial Médica Panamericana; 2002.
13.Doubilet P. Evaluación ecográfica del crecimiento fetal. En: Callen P. Ecografía en Obstetricia y Ginecología. 4th ed. Buenos Aires: Editorial Médica Panarnericana; 2002.
14.Fiestas C, Valera D, Guerrero C, Diaz E. Utilidad del diámetro biparietal corregido para el cálculo del peso fetal determinado por ultrasonido. Rev Peru Ginecol Obstet [Internet]. 2006 [citado 21/01/2021];52(4):253-256. Disponible en: https://sisbib.unmsm.edu.pe/BVRevistas/ginecologia/vol52_n4/pdf/A12V52N4.pdf
15.Das UG, Sysyn GD. Abnormal fetal growth: intrauterine growth retardation, small for gestational age, large for gestational age. Pediatr Clin North Am [Internet]. 2004 [citado 21/01/2022];51(3):639-654, viii. Disponible en: https://europepmc.org/article/med/15157589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2004.01.004
16.Di Liberto Moreno GP. Predicción de macrosomía fetal por medición ultrasonográfica de la circunferencia abdominal y resultados perinatales según vía de parto. Hospital Ramón Rezola-Cañete, Agosto-Diciembre 2010 [tesis]. Lima: Universidad Ricardo Palma; 2011 [citado 21/01/2021]. Disponible en: https://repositorio.urp.edu.pe/handle/20.500.14138/248
17.Scacchi MS, Van der Velde J, Vergara R, Rivas ME, Analis S, López Mautino P. Guía de Práctica Clínica. Restricción de crecimiento intrauterino. Septiembre 2019 [Internet]. Buenos Aires: Hospital Materno Infantil “Ramón Sardá”; 2019. Disponible en: https://www.sarda.org.ar/images/GPC_RCIU_Maternidad_Sarda_2019.pdf
18.Ferreiro RM, Valdés Amador L. Eficacia de distintas fórmulas ecográficas en la estimación del peso fetal a término. Rev Cubana Obstet Ginecol [Internet]. 2010 [citado 21/01/2022];36(4):490-501. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0138-600X2010000400003
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who have publications with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors will retain their copyright and assign to the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will simultaneously be subject to a Creative Commons License / Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) that allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and first publication in this journal are indicated.
- Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., depositing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a monographic volume) as long as the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives or on their web page) before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access).
15 junio 2025
