Cytomegalovirus disease in renal transplant recipients. The diagnostic presumption based on the clinical method
Keywords:
cytomegalovirus disease, renal transplantation, ganciclovirAbstract
Introduction: cytomegalovirus disease represents a threat to immunosuppressed patients and, in particular, to renal transplant recipients.
Objective: to describe the evolution of renal transplant recipients with presumptive diagnosis of cytomegalovirus disease and empirical treatment regimen.
Methods: longitudinal, prospective and exploratory study that included 81 adult renal transplant recipients with presumptive diagnosis of cytomegalovirus disease divided into two groups: younger (17, 20.98%) and older than one year post-graft evolution (64, 79.01%), with clinical and laboratory evaluations and treatment with intravenous ganciclovir. Non-parametric tests, bivariate correlations, binomial test and Mann Whitney U test were used.
Results: mean age 48.46±11.10 years, male sex and white skin color prevailed. Dyspnea was more frequent in both groups. Neutrophil count, platelet count and glutamic pyruvic glutamic transaminase value were not significant (p˃0.05). Serum creatinine values of ≥170 μMol/l predominated: 294±143.18 and 283.59±146.55 respectively (p=0.040). Symptom onset was similar: 5.88±2.18 and 5.78±2.00 days with no significant differencesand hospital stay was shorter in those older than one year -25.92±10.78 (p=0.029)-. The most frequent serological status for cytomegalovirus was donor (-) recipient (-). Nine patients died, four (23.52%) less than one year post-grafting. The enteropathic form was the most common; the coinfection was urinary tract infection and the complication was acute allograft dysfunction.
Conclusions: the use of the clinical method and the early initiation of treatment were effective in the diagnostic and therapeutic definition of cytomegalovirus disease.
Downloads
References
1.Cruz Abascal RE, Véliz González M, Hernández Fernández ME, González Cárdenas Y, Hernández Pérez OA. Enfermedad por citomegalovirus en el trasplante renal. Rev Cubana Med [Internet]. 2018 [21/03/2023];57(2):[aprox. 9 p.]. Disponible en: https://revmedicina.sld.cu/index.php/med/article/view/42/7
2.Ahmad SH. Management of CMV viremia in renal transplant patients from perspective of clinical practice within United Kingdom. Ann Clin Virol [Internet]. 2021 [21/03/2023];2(1):1004. Disponible en: https://www.remedypublications.com/open-access/management-of-cmv-viremia-in-renal-transplant-patients-from-perspective-6819.pdf
3.Felipe C, Ferreira AN, de Paula M, Viana L, Cristelli M, Medina Pestana J, et al. Incidence and risk factors associated with cytomegalovirus infection after the treatment of acute rejection during the first year in kidney transplant recipients receiving preemptive therapy. Transpl Infect Dis [Internet]. 2019 [21/03/2023];21(6):e13106. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31081566/. https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.13106
4.Sagedal S, Nordal KP, Hartmann A, Sund S, Scott H, Degré M, et al. The impact of cytomegalovirus infection and disease on rejection episodes in renal allograft recipients. Am J Transplant [Internet]. 2002 [21/03/2023];2(9):850–856. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12392291/. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-6143.2002.20907.x
5.Schnitzler MA, Lowell JA, Hardinger KL, Boxerman SB, Bailey TC, Brennan DC. The association of cytomegalovirus sero-pairing with outcomes and costs following cadaveric renal transplantation prior to the introduction of oral ganciclovir CMV prophylaxis. Am J Transplant [Internet]. 2003 [21/03/2023];3(4):445–451. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12694067/. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-6143.2003.00069.x
6.López Oliva MO, Flores J, Madero R, Escuin F, Santana MJ, Bellón T, et al. Cytomegalovirus infection after kidney transplantation and long-term graft loss. Nefrologia [Internet]. 2017 [21/03/2023];37(5):515–25. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28946964/. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nefro.2016.11.018
7.Razonable RR, Humar A. Cytomegalovirus in solid organ transplant recipients-Guidelines of the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice. Clin Transplant [Internet]. 2019 [21/03/2023];33(9):e13512. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30817026/. https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.13512
8.Kotton CN, Kumar D, Caliendo AM, Huprikar S, Chou S, Danziger-Isakov L, et al. The Third International Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Cytomegalovirus in solid-organ transplantation. Transplantation [Internet]. 2018 [21/03/2023];102(6):900-931. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29596116/. https://doi.org/10.1097/tp.0000000000002191
9.Alfieri CM, Molinari P, Gandolfo M, Campise M, Cresseri D, Regalia A, et al. Cytomegalovirus disease in renal transplanted patients: Prevalence, determining factors, and influence on graft and patients outcomes. Pathogens [Internet]. 2021 [21/03/2023];10(4):473. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8069780/. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10040473
10.Bezerra de Matos S, Meyer R, Washington de Mendonça Lima F. Cytomegalovirus infection after renal transplantation: occurrence, clinical features, and the cutoff for antigenemia in a University Hospital in Brazil. Infect Chemother [Internet]. 2017 [21/03/2023];49(4):255-261. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5754335/. https://doi.org/10.3947/ic.2017.49.4.255
11.Andrade Sierra J, Heredia Pimentel A, Rojas Campos E, Ramírez Flores D, Cerrillos Gutierrez JI, Miranda Díaz AG, et al. Cytomegalovirus in renal transplant recipients from living donors with and without valganciclovir prophylaxis and with immunosuppression based on anti-thymocyte globulin or basiliximab. Int J Infect Dis [Internet]. 2021 [21/03/2023];107:18-24. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33862205/. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.04.032
12.Selvey LA, Lim WH, Boan P, Swaminathan R, Slimings C, Harrison AE, et al. Cytomegalovirus viraemia and mortality in renal transplant recipients in the era of antiviral prophylaxis. Lessons from the western Australian experience. BMC Infect Dis [Internet]. 2017 [21/03/2023];17(1):501. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5514475/. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2599-y
13.Navarro Rodríguez V, Herrera Munoz A, Castro A, Ramos Esquivel A. Risk factors for cytomegalovirus disease in seropositive renal transplant recipients; a single-center case-controlled study. J Nephropathol [Internet]. 2017 [21/03/2023];6(3):240-247. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5607989/. https://doi.org/10.15171/jnp.2017.39
14.Yadav P, Yadava K, Tandon N, Prasad N, Dhole T. Cytomegalovirus disease in post-renal transplant patients: an Indian experience – A prospective observational study. Indian J Transplant [Internet]. 2021 [21/03/2023];15(1):29-33. Disponible en: https://journals.lww.com/ijjt/Fulltext/2021/15010/Cytomegalovirus_Disease_in_Post_Renal_Transplant.6.aspx
15.SayilarEI, Ergün I. Efficacy and safety of low-dose valganciclovir prophylaxis among renal transplant recipients. Cukurova Med J [Internet]. 2020 [21/03/2023];45(1):347-351. Disponible en: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/956895. https://doi.org/10.17826/cumj.632257
16.Borroto Díaz G, Barceló Acosta M, Guerrero Díaz C. Infección por citomegalovirus en pacientes con injerto renal. Rev Cubana Med [Internet]. 2003 [citado 21/03/2023];42(4):[aprox. 6 p.]. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-75232003000400005
17.Jehn U, Schütte-Nütgen K, Bautz J, Pavenstädt H, Suwelack B, Thölking G, et al. Clinical features of BK-polyomavirus and cytomegalovirus co-infection after kidney transplantation. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2020 [21/03/2023];10(1):22406. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7772341/. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79799-6
18.Benotmane I, Solis M, Moulin B, Fafi-Kremer S, Caillard S. Letter to the Editor concerning “Cytomegalovirus prevention strategies and the risk of BK polyomavirus viremia and nephropathy”. Am J Transplant [Internet]. 2019 [21/03/2023];19(12):3438-3439. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31605447/. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.15648
19.Han SH, Yoo SG, Han KD, La Y, Kwon DE, Lee KH. The incidence and effect of cytomegalovirus disease on mortality in transplant recipients and general population: Real-world Nationwide Cohort Data. Int J Med Sci [Internet]. 2021 [21/03/2023];18(14):3333-3341. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364452/. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.62621
20.Ramanan P, Razonable RR. Cytomegalovirus infections in solid organ transplantation: a review: Infect Chemother [Internet]. 2013 [21/03/2023];45(3):260-271. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3848521/. https://doi.org/10.3947/ic.2013.45.3.260
21.Kotton CN, Kamar N. New insights on CMV management in solid organ transplant patients: prevention, treatment, and management of resistant/refractory disease. Infect Dis Ther [Internet]. 2023 [21/03/2023];12(2):333-342. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9925645/. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-022-00746-1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who have publications with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors will retain their copyright and assign to the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will simultaneously be subject to a Creative Commons License / Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) that allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and first publication in this journal are indicated.
- Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., depositing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a monographic volume) as long as the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives or on their web page) before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access).