Physiological birth in patients with previous cesarean section
Keywords:
cesarean section, repeat, intraoperative complications, postoperative complicationsAbstract
A cross sectional descriptive study was conducted at the Central Maternity Hospital in Windhoek from January to December 2008. The universe consisted of 528 patients who had undergone a cesarean section and were treated that year in order to reduce the number of cesarean sections performed. Medical records were reviewed to obtain the necessary information. A database that allowed the statistical analysis was created and several variables were considered: age, type of delivery, the first indication of cesarean section, birth weight and complications. It was concluded that most patients were between 20 and 25 years of age. There was a prevalence of patients with cesarean delivery in the second pregnancy (62.9%), while physiological birth was 37.1% in the second pregnancy. Appropriate weight of 3000-3999 grams (42.9%) was predominant. Complications were more frequent in patients who had cesarean delivery (37%), while they affected 20% of those who had a physiological birth. The results were expressed as tables and after a comprehensive literature review, conclusions and recommendations were issued.Downloads
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who have publications with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors will retain their copyright and assign to the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will simultaneously be subject to a Creative Commons License / Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) that allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and first publication in this journal are indicated.
- Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., depositing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a monographic volume) as long as the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives or on their web page) before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access).