Fluid therapy in children with septic shock in an Intensive Care Unit
Keywords:
shock septic, fluid therapy, childAbstract
Introduction: septic shock is a common cause of death in children worldwide, it is the first cause of admission to the units of non-coronary intensive care and it is an emerging disease. Objective: to describe the results of therapy with fluid in patients with septic shock at “José Luis Miranda” Hospital in one year of study. Method: a descriptive, longitudinal, prospective study between January and December 2012 with patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit of the hospital was realized. Data were recorded in the statistical professional program SPSS version 15.0, the information was showed in tables and graphs and inferential statistics tests were applied. Results: the most affected age group was that of one month to one year, of male sex; severe acute respiratory infections were the most frequent etiologies; the administration of intravenous fluids contributed to the recovery of clinical parameters related to perfusion at six hours; with the administration of 60ml/kg of intravenous fluids there was a recovery of blood pressure in most children. Conclusions: aggressive and early administration of intravenous fluids contributes to the recovery of clinical parameters related to perfusion at six hours and reducing mortality in children with septic shock.Downloads
References
1. Rohde JM, Odden AJ, Bonham C, Kuhn L, Malani PN, Chen LM, et al. The epidemiology of acute organ system dysfunction from severe sepsis outside of the intensive care unit. J Hosp Med [Internet]. 2013 [citado 28 Sept 2015];8(5):243–247. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23401431
2. Donoso FA, Arraigada SD, Cruces RP, Díaz RF. Shock séptico en pediatría I. Enfoque actual en el diagnóstico y tratamiento. Rev Child Pediatr [Internet]. 2013 [citado 28 Sept 2015];84(5):484-498. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0370-41062013000500002
3. Brierley J, Carcillo JA, Choong K, Cornell T, Decaen A, Deymann A, et al. Clinical practice parameters for hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal septic shock: 2007 update from the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med [Internet]. 2009 [citado 2 Sept 2015];37(2):666-88. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19325359
4. Goldstein B, Giroir B, Randolph A. International pediatric sepsis consensus conference: definitions for sepsis and organ dysfunction in pediatrics. Pediatr Crit Care Med [Internet]. 2005 [citado 28 Sept 2015];6(1):2-8. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15636651
5. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med [Internet]. 2013 [citado 22 Feb 2015];39(2):165-228. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23361625
6. Donoso FA, Arraigada SD, Cruces RP, Díaz RF. Shock séptico en pediatría II. Enfoque actual en el diagnóstico y tratamiento. Rev Chil Pediatr [Internet]. 2013 [citado 28 Sept 2015];84(6):606-615. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0370-41062013000600003
7. Shime N, Kawasaki T, Saito O, Akamine Y, Toda Y, Takeuchi M, et al. Incidence and risk factors for mortality in paediatric severe sepsis: results from the national paediatric intensive care registry in Japan. Intensive Care Med [Internet]. 2012 [citado 8 Nov 2015];38(7):1191-7. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22527068
8. Carcillo JA. Capillary refill time is a very useful clinical sign in early recognition and treatment of very sick children. Pediatr Crit Care Med [Internet]. 2012 [citado 28 Sept 2015];13(2):210-2. Disponible en: http://journals.lww.com/pccmjournal/Citation/2012/03000/Capillary_refill_time_is_a_very_useful_clinical.28.aspx
9. Crook J, Taylor RM. The agreement of fingertip and sternum capillary refill time in children. Arh Dis Child [Internet]. 2013 [citado 28 Sept 2015];98(4):265-8. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23396679
10. Cruz AT, Perry AM, Williams EA, Graf JM, Wuestner ER, Patel B. Implementation of goal-directed therapy for children with suspected sepsis in the emergency department. Pediatrics [Internet]. 2011 [citado 2 Jun 2015];127(3):e758-66. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21339277
11. Weiss SL, Fitzgerald JC, Pappachan J, Wheeler D, Jaramillo-Bustamante JC, Salloo A, et al. Global epidemiology of pediatric severe sepsis: the sepsis prevalence, outcomes, and therapies study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med [Internet]. 2015 [citado 28 Sept 2015];191(10):1147-1157. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25734408
12. McIntyre L, Fergusson DA, Rowe B, Cook DJ, Arabi Y, Bagshaw SM, et al. The PRECISE RCT: evolution of an early septic shock fluid resuscitation trial. Transfus Med Rev [Internet]. 2012 [citado 15 Sept 2015];26(4):333-41. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22222146
13. Woodcock TE, Woodcock TM. Revised starling equation and the glycocalyx model of transvascular fluid exchange: an improved paradigm for prescribing intravenous fluid therapy. Br J Anaesth [Internet]. 2012 [citado 28 Sept 2015];108(3)384-94. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22290457
14. Perner A, Haase N, Guttormsen AB, Tenhunen J, Klemenzson G, Åneman A, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 versus Ringer’s acetate in severe sepsis. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2012 [citado 28 Sept 2015];367:124-134. Disponible en: http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1204242
15. Myburgh JA, Finfer S, Bellomo R, Billot L, Cass A, Gattas D, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch or saline for fluid resuscitation in intensive care. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2012 [citado 12 May 2015];367:1901-11. Disponible en: http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1209759#t=article
16. Harvey G, Foster G, Manan A, Thabane L, Parker MJ. Factors affecting pediatric isotonic fluid resuscitation efficiency: a randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of syringe size. BMC Emergency Med [Internet]. 2013 [citado 28 Sept 2015];13:14. Disponible en: http://bmcemergmed.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-227X-13-14
17. Chopra A, Kumar V, Dutta A. Hypertonic versus normal saline as initial fluid bolus in pediatric septic shock. Indian J Pediatr [Internet]. 2011 [citado 28 Sept 2015];78(7):833-7. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21290201
18. Arraigada DS, Donoso FA, Cruces RP, Díaz RF. Shock séptico en unidad de cuidados intensivos. Enfoque actual en el tratamiento. Rev Chil Pediatr [Internet]. 2015 [citado 28 Sept 2015];86(4):224-235. Disponible en: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037041061500159X
19. Loza Vázquez, León Gil C, León Regidor A. Nuevas alternativas terapéuticas para la sepsis grave en el paciente crítico. Revisión. Med Intensiva [Internet]. 2011 [citado 18 Mar 2015];35:236-45. Disponible en: http://www.medintensiva.org/es/nuevas-alternativas-terapeuticas-sepsis-grave/articulo/S0210569110002706/
20. Arraigada DS, Donoso FA, Cruces RP, Díaz RF. Shock séptico en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos. Terapéutica avanzada, inmunoparálisis y genómica. Estado del arte. Arch Argent Pediatr [Internet]. 2014 [citado 28 Sept 2015];112(4):358-365. Disponible en: http://repositorio.unab.cl/xmlui/handle/ria/937
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who have publications with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors will retain their copyright and assign to the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will simultaneously be subject to a Creative Commons License / Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) that allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and first publication in this journal are indicated.
- Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., depositing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a monographic volume) as long as the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives or on their web page) before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access).