Results of cochlear implant in children over six years of age with deep prelingual hearing loss
Keywords:
cochlear implants, hearing loss, childAbstract
Introduction: the National Program of cochlear implant established in Cuba has benefited freely 216 children with severe and deep hearing loss. Objective: to compare the results obtained in children older than six years with deep prelingual hearing loss who have cochlear implant with a group of the same characteristics using another type of programmable digital prosthetic attachment. Methods: a prospective, descriptive and quasi-experimental study was realized at "José Luis Miranda" Hospital from October 2012 to September 2015. It was used a non-probabilistic sampling and the sample was 15 patients older than six years of age who underwent a cochlear implant (Group 1) and 25 of the same age who used a programmable digital hearing attachment (Group 2). A questionnaire was designed that included the variables: sex, age, age of implant, etiology, language, auditory performance and stage of rehabilitation. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and the Mann-Whitney test were used. Results: all patients with cochlear implants passed the detection-discrimination stage, seven reached the identification-recognition stage (46.7%) and four reached the stages of discrimination-identification and recognition-comprehension, respectively (26.7%). Patients with digital prostheses failed to advance to higher levels of rehabilitation (80%). Conclusions: Patients older than six years old who received a cochlear implant achieved higher auditory performance, higher levels in the rehabilitation stages and achieved better communication than users of digital prostheses.Downloads
References
1. Cristiani H. Historia delaudífono [Internet]. Argentina: Mutualidad Argentina de Hipoacúsicos; 2016 [citado 20 Dic 2016]. Disponible en: http://www.mah.org.ar/historia-de-los-audifonos
2. ¿Qué es un implante coclear? [Internet] España: Federación AICE; 2016 [citado 20 Dic 2016]. Disponible en: http://implantecoclear.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=76:ique-es-un-implante-coclear&catid=62:que-es&Itemid=82
3. Roche JP, Hansen MR. On the horizon: cochlear implant technology. Otolaryngol Clin North Am [Internet]. 2015 [citado 27 Abr 2016]; 48(6):1097-116. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26443490
4. Cila Umat, Rinze AT. Cochlear implant research updates. In Tech [Internet]. 2012 Apr 27 [citado 20 Dic 2016]. Disponible en: http://blogs.sld.cu/marionod/2012/08/02/cila-umat-and-rinze-anthony-tange-cochlear-implant-research-updates-intech-april-27-2012/
5. Corvera-Behar G, Cheja-Mochón R. Resultados del implante coclear colocado en pacientes prelinguales de 8 a 12 años de edad, quienes actualmente se encuentran en edad adulta. An Orl Mex. 2012;57(1):31-32.
6. Martini A, Bovo R, Trevisi P, Forli F, Berrettini S. Cochlear implant in children: rational, indications and cost/efficacy. Minerva Pediatr [Internet]. 2013 [citado 20 Dic 2015];65(3):325-39. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23685383
7. Cosetti MK, Waltzman SB. Outcomes in cochlear implantation: variables affecting performance in adults and children. Otolaryngol Clin North Am [Internet]. 2012 [citado 15 Abr 2016];45(1):155-71. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22115688
8. Quique BY, FA MT. Métodos unisensoriales para la rehabilitación de la persona con implante coclear y métodos musicoterapéuticos como nueva herramienta de intervención. Rev Otorrinolaringol Cir Cabeza Cuello [Internet]. 2013 [citado 30Jun 2016];73(1):94-108. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.cl/pdf/orl/v73n1/art16.pdf
9. Byaruhanga R, Roland JT, Buname G, Kakande E, Awubwa M, Ndorelire C, et al. A case report: the first successful cochlear implant in Uganda. Afr Health Sci [Internet]. 2015 [citado 28 Nov 2015];15(4):1342-1348. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26958040
10. Jeya Kumar A. Pediatric cochlear implantation. Curr Opin Pediatr [Internet]. 2013 Feb [citado 28 Nov 2015];23(3):346-50. Disponible en: https://www.medschool.lsuhsc.edu/pediatrics/docs/Pediatric%20Cochlear%20Implants%20Grand%20Rounds.pdf
11. Rahal EM, Mena GP, Muñoz SD, Cárdenas GR, Mansilla JF, Cardemil MF. Resultados del Programa Nacional de Implantes Cocleares: Servicio de Otorrinolaringología del Hospital Barros Luco Trudeau. Rev Otorrinolaringol Cir Cabeza Cuello [Internet]. 2013 [citado 28Nov 2015];73(3):[aprox. 8 p.]. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-48162013000300004
12. Teschner M, Polite C, Lenarz T, Lustig L. Cochlear implantation in different health-care systems: disparities between Germany and the United States. Otol Neurotol [Internet]. 2013 [citado 25 Sept2016];34(1):66-74. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23232831
13. Arauz S, Boccio C, CorderoL, Curet C, Vicente D, Hocsman E, et al. Recomendaciones del Comité de Expertos en implante coclear y dispositivos implantables de la Federación Argentina de Sociedades de O.R.L. (en concordancia con guías internacionales). Buenos Aires, 25 de abril de 2016 [Internet] [citado 15 Jun 2016]. Disponible en: http://www.faso.org.ar/imagenes/informe.pdf
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who have publications with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors will retain their copyright and assign to the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will simultaneously be subject to a Creative Commons License / Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) that allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and first publication in this journal are indicated.
- Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., depositing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a monographic volume) as long as the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives or on their web page) before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access).